Sidi Hamza Yusuf’s Stance on SUFI shaykhs

Question: How necessarily important is it to commit to one shaykh to develop your spirituality?

Answer:
You’ll get different opinions depending on who you ask. There’s a nice translation of Ibn Abbad’s letter on whether its obligatory to take a shaykh. There’s a saying, “Whoever doesn’t have a shaykh, Shaytan is his shaykh.” Generally, first and foremost it means you must have a teacher for the Shariah. You have to have someone who teaches you the religion. When we visit Sh. Mimmar (spelling?) the other day, what did he keep saying? “Get teachers even if you have to pay them. Have teachers. You need teachers to guide you. You need to have sources of knowledge.” In terms of spiritual advancement, if people are having spiritual experiences its good to have people who know what they are doing. Suhba (companionship) is also good. Many of the shuyukh of this period, like Shaykh Ahmad Mashur al-Haddad, who I studied with, Dr. Umar studied with, Sidi Abdul Hakim Winters studied with- he was of the opinion that the idea of taslim was over, the surrendering yourselves to a shaykh completely was over, this wasn’t its time. And there are a lot of dysfunctional aspect in a lot of relationships that happen, so there are problems in all these systems. And surrendering your sovereignty, you have to be very careful with that, who you surrender your sovereignty to, some people demand a lot. There’s a poem by Robert Frost, “They say the truth will make you free, my truth will make you slave to me.” So you just have to be careful, there’s a lot of manipulation out there. People from Pakistan know very well about the peer sahibs, and what happens there. I’m not making this up, am I? A lot of these people are flat-out charlatans, there’s charlatans all over West Africa, you know ‘Sufi shaykh, come and be a murid.’ The danger of Sufism that bothers me, is there are a lot of principles in Tasawwuf that are very easily manipulated into certain cultic control mechanisms and they become very dangerous. I think for those of us in the West, we come from a tradition of individual sovereignty and independence of self. And I personally believe those are very high Islamic characteristics and qualities. I think a lot of the problems in the East is all this slavishness, and devotion and obsequiousness to the grand Master Pu-Ba whoever. I mean, if you want my personal opinion, I do believe that. That does not mean I don’t show the utmost respect to my teachers. Sh. Abdullah bin Bayyah is my teacher and what I love about him is he’s somebody who respects my opinion, listens to my opinion, he’s never been despotic in any way. Habib Ahmad Mashur al-Haddad was not despotic at all, he didn’t get angry at people, he didn’t abuse people. Sifadur Harawi was like that. You just have to look to people and observe them. You just have to be careful. And then there are some people who are just deluded or they are trying to keep something alive and they have their limitations. Sidi Ahmad Zarruq said that there weren’t any complete teachers by his time, the 9th century, the completed masters were gone and to just find people who could do the best that they could do and recognize their shortcomings and don’t have greater expectations that they can do that. Wallahu Ta’ala Alaam. Allah knows best.

–Taken from Shaykh Hamza Yusuf’s CD set on Tasfiyah al-Qublub, (Refinement of the Heart) by Imam Ibn Juzayy al-Kalbi, CD 12, Track 3 and 4 (copyright)

I leave it to you to decide… my personal opinion is there are great limitations to what he has said e.g:

the completed masters were gone and to just find people who could do the best that they could do and recognize their shortcomings and don’t have greater expectations that they can do that.

This is not the case as there will be the awliyah until the day of judgement. either the kamil shaykh or the mujnoon awliyah will be there. once there is no awliyah walking on the face of the earth yawmal Qiyama will commence! Also he seems to be a man requiring respect and hourner from the people when this should only be to Allah. we do not need to seek respect and hourner from people. it is Allah who gives us this should we deserve it.

Advertisements

Author: Sheikh Nazim

Islam is in the spotlight now more than ever before and this has caused people to question the faith itself and none more so than the new-age modernists muslims, largely from the convert western countries who are hell-bent on reforming Islam and its traditional values. This blog is a small space in the vastness of the internet where the fight to preserve, uphold and dignify the traditional inherent human values, are proactively argued against the onslaught of modernist propaganda and hate. Covering topics from current affairs to life-enriching inspirations, though to the traditional teachings of the pious and the awliyah of the past and the present. If you would like to contribute to this blog, or become an author of articles then why not contact me on Islamglobalmessage@gmail.com

5 thoughts on “Sidi Hamza Yusuf’s Stance on SUFI shaykhs”

  1. Assalamu Alaikum, I think Shaykh Hamza Yusuf was speaking about the level of scholars, the very top ones are gone. It will deteriorate with time.

    How did you reach this conclusion?
    “Also he seems to be a man requiring respect and hourner from the people when this should only be to Allah. we do not need to seek respect and hourner from people. it is Allah who gives us this should we deserve it.”

    1. when he said ‘Sh. Abdullah bin Bayyah is my teacher and what I love about him is he’s somebody who respects my opinion, listens to my opinion, he’s never been despotic in any way.’ clearly indicates that he has a desire for his opinions to be heard by these recognised shuyukh, but Allahu Alam, one can’t open his heart and find out what he meant, only by analyzing this text and judging by whats apparent can one only get an Intellectual conclusion but never a concrete one.

      1. Agreed but remember we can only hold people to account of what they utter. Hence respond accordingly. If I was to say I will kill you, will react accordingly. (Excuse the use of example) You will not take into account what my intentions are. Similarly, when someone is free and under no obligation to anyone or anything. But, rather he has the free will to say what he wants, we have to judge him accordingly. It would be a different matter if someone says something under due stress, oppression or tyranny like many of the companions were.

  2. Pingback: MyBeliefs.co.uk

Your thoughts on this article are welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s