BBC 2: The Crusades Part 2 Review

Where can i begin with this one? After having done the review of part 1 i had promised myself to avoid doing a review for part 2. I wanted to save myself from being dragged into yet another of the age-old sentimental debates and discussions. An endless argumentative discussion which has no ends in sight. Unfortunately, i had no choice but to put pen to paper and again let myself try to ‘page in’ my views of what Dr Thomas Asbridge accounts of the crusades depicts and mounts to.

Frankly speaking, from the beginning of part two Dr Thomas Asbridge makes an illusive and a pathetic attempt to bring to our attention the reasons why the first crusades lost their stronghold of the “crusader kingdom”. He places the fault on the elements and not so much to the power and exuberance, the strong resilience and willpower of Saladin and his men to regain the lost lands. From the onset of the first crusades, it is clear that it was a provocation and an offensive attack which the western, christian world had launched upon the muslim east. The muslims were merely being defensive of their lands, of oppression and destruction.

A defensive battle still being forged and fought up to this day! The crusades of the middle ages may have ended, however the crusades of today has taken a new meaning and a ulteria motive. That being, the complete wipeout of the muslim faith, Islam. Not just the recapturing of the holy land, Jerusalem. (although it has to some extent been accomplished already by the franks).
I found it appalling that despite being a professor, a man of reputable standing in the academic world, Dr Thomas Asbridge uses a childish like attitude to say “my hero’s died because of the harsh environmental nature of the land and not because of your effort of your people”. – A display of defensive reaction suitable for the school playground!
To say that the causes of the loss of the first crusades was largely down to “dehydration” or the “lack of water” is simply a shambolic attempt to hide away from the truth. The environmental climate surely would have played a part. But, i fail to see how this would have been the major cause of the loss of the war. By the end of the first crusades and the beginning of the second, the crusaders in their “crusader kingdom”, had settled in the holy land for more than 30 years in which they had sufficient time to climitise and become fully adaptable to the change and the environment of the middle eastern lands. If the cultural boundaries had begun to be shifted and new boundaries formed, where one culture was influencing the other. Would not the “mighty crusaders” have had enough time to become climitise to the harsh environmental nature of the land, by the time Saladin came knocking at their doors? The answer is clear. Dr Thomas Asbridge also makes a number attempts and assumptions to portray an image that the muslims only won because they had mother nature to their side, something which Saladin was fully able to take advantage of, which in turn helped him to re-gain the muslim stolen lands. Such utter nonsense!
I could barely go watching beyond 25mins of the programme. The amount of biased journalism which he showed was unbearable. From the onset of part 2 Dr Thomas Asbridge was clear with the vision he wanted to clearly embed on the minds of his audience. the muslim warrior, the uniter and the guardian of the muslims faith is and was not all the things that are widely circulated about him. That, in actual fact Saladin was a mindless murderer, a mass murderer of men, women, and children, that is. A lunatic who was bent of burning down Jerusalem at all means, to secure his rule and prove his leadership to the other feuding muslim fractions. Where as on the other hand, We find Dr Thomas Asbridge constantly paints the image of “richard the lion heart” as a saint, who was the saviour of middle-eastern christians, enslaved by the tyrant muslim ruler, Saladin. The proof is in the pudding as they often say, When salad in came to the doors of jerusalem, it is a widely known and accepted fact that, Saladin agreed to a surrender agreement made by the Christians at the time, when surrendering Jerusalem to Saladin. In which, it was agreed no christian will be killed or molested on his/her way of the holy land. That, all christians will find safe of passage out of Jerusalem and into the christian lands. Well, Dr Thomas Asbridge seeks out to destroy this image of Saladin, a man who was said to have been pious, a man who had high moral standings and beliefs. Dr Thomas Asbridge paints a picture of Saladin as being a monster! where he apparently said on reaching the doors of Jerusalem, “you will see no mercy nor get any amnesty”. Dr Thomas Asbridge seeks to draw parallels between what the first crusaders army did, killing every muslim resident of Jerusalem with that of what and Saladin ‘apparently’ did. Just so that he can find some justification of the crusaders army and say in turn ‘well the muslims were also monsters, they also killed everyone and spared none.’ to the question of crusaders being a cruel and inhumane beings.

The biased, view-point is further reinforced, as he, during the course of the programme mentions several times that “he is a lover of the crusades and a student of the topic”. This is evidential enough for anyone to know the programme cannot give a neutral view of the events that unfolded during those eras pf the crusades. It is bound to be opinionated with Dr Thomas Asbridge’s beliefs and views of the crusades.
It lacks that credibility to galvanise the open-minded, intellectual person to his way of beliefs and views of the crusades. In part one we were given the image that the “warriors of god” – the crusaders, were able to overcome all the odds and still manage to over throw the evil muslim rule of the holy land. An image of “superhuman” men was cast deep into the minds of Dr Thomas Asbridge’s audiences by the end of part 1. However, in part 2 he alludes to the point that these “superhuman” men were dwafted and annihilated by the environments! Although it is contradictory by itself, it begs to question why didn’t the invading christian armies, the crusaders, the men with superhuman abilities, the men who can overcome all the odds, manage to repel the muslim armies when they were already settled in these land for more than 30 years and had climitised by then?
All in all, i have to say that, part 1 was bad enough, but part 2 has redefined that term ‘bad’ in my definition of words! It was clear from the beginning to the end, Dr Thomas Asbridge was out to destroy the heroic and the saintly image of Saladin and further glorify the image of “richard the lion heart”. I will end with this, that whenever the two leaders were refered to, Dr Thomas Asbridge always seemed to give richard the upper hand. He always refered to richard as ” richard the LION HEART” and when it came to Saladin, only “Saladin” nothing more. I can only use one word to describe part two and its contents that were delivered, and that is ‘Despicable!’.

About these ads

20 thoughts on “BBC 2: The Crusades Part 2 Review

  1. I have never read so much garbage in my life. You make Dr Asbridge’s views seem totally neutral with your own pathetic take on the programme which is so muslim biased that it is embarrassing. Your failure to use capital letters when referring to Richard the Lionheart and France is quite pathetic and your take on the ‘defensive’ muslim world is comical seeing as Spain and parts of France were fighting muslim armies before the crusades started.

    Dr Asbridge went to pains to explain that Salahadin was a wise and eloquent leader who whilst being militarily aware also showed leniency toward his enemies when it was required. In no way did the Doctor paint him in a bad light.

    As with today it the muslim world who are the aggressors who refuse to accept that any other faith is in any way an equal to the islamic religion. Your view that there is a modern ‘crusade’ to wipe out the muslim world is paranoia at its worst and the reason why many people do not have any time for the Islamic religion or muslim people in general. Your threat to another poster for daring to post something that you perceived to be an insult to the islamic religion proved that you are unqualified to make an educated and non-biased comment on an informative programme.

    • Garbage? well, coming from a atheist background and taking no sides. i have to say, what you call garbage here is not entirely true! The person (poster) whoever he/she maybe has said in part one of the review, – which i also happen to have read. That, Dr. Asbridge does happen to highlight some farely balanced points. Now, i am no supporter of anyone. But, SOME of the things the poster said, although in a blunt manner is true and accurate.
      You fail to provide any reasoning why this is garbage yet are eager to play the blame game. I agree some of the areas of what has been said is false and fabricated by the poster. But, should this mean we resort to personal attakcs?

  2. Hi are using WordPress for your site platform? I’m new to
    the blog world but I’m trying to get started and create my own.

    Do you require any coding expertise to make your
    own blog? Any help would be really appreciated!

  3. Nice post. I was checking constantly this blog and I am impressed!
    Extremely useful information specifically the last part :) I care for such
    information much. I was seeking this certain information for a long time.
    Thank you and best of luck.

  4. This is the right web site for anybody who would like to find out about this topic.
    You realize so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I personally would want to…HaHa).
    You definitely put a fresh spin on a subject that
    has been discussed for ages. Wonderful stuff, just great!

  5. Touring in India is not possible unless you take the help of
    tourist operator. Whether it is Hulu or any other site, it is accessible.

    That’s because the terrain varies from the low elevations, where the climate is typical of a tropical island, to high mountainous areas where the
    climate is very different.

  6. Probiotics were found to be effective in treating symptoms of
    Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), stress, and Candida via
    studies. On the other hand, Aroian says Bt is attractive because it is a well-understood,
    natural substance for controlling plant pests that is believed to be safe for animals and humans.
    Is Clinicians Multi – Flora good for a specific type of diarrhoea.

  7. But many dismiss this condition as a seasonal hazard saying that “it. Fungal sinusitis is basically described as the inflammation of the sinus cavity. Butalbital compound is sold under the brand names Fiorinal and Fiormor with Codeine.

  8. Hey There. I discovered your blog the usage of msn.

    That is a really neatly written article. I will be sure to bookmark it and return to learn
    extra of your helpful information. Thank you for the post.
    I’ll certainly comeback.

  9. hello!,I love your writing very a lot! proportion we keep up a correspondence more approximately your post on AOL?
    I need an expert on this space to resolve my problem. Maybe that’s you!
    Having a look forward to see you.

  10. Purchase these from our site, or bring your own, it doesn’t matter,
    we will still give you free installation and configuration. In this way you will not mess
    up the design by inserting your advertising in places that
    will make your site look ugly. There are several wordpress theme designers and
    developers in the world to add beauty and functional features to your website.

  11. For beginners, there are specific recommended sex toys for men.
    Surely fingers, tongues, penises, clitorises and vaginas
    and so forth all deliver terrific sexual stimulation and satisfaction.
    It vibrates in rhythmic patterns according to the music you listen to.

  12. Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to assert that I acquire actually
    enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing
    to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently quickly.

  13. I will immediately grab your rss feed as I can not to find your email
    subscription link or newsletter service. Do
    you’ve any? Kindly allow me realize in order that I could subscribe.

    Thanks.

  14. Buses are also popular as a medium for one of city’s orlando taxi service most contentious
    political debates. But I’m gonna preface this conversation by telling you that I’ll.
    You may have to negotiate price, and price negotiations
    can be tricky. On the whole the taxis and please yourself with a little help
    once in a while.

Your thoughts on this article are welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s